Bitcoin Rallies Above $97K Despite Weak Institutional Demand
Bitcoin’s Price Surge and Market Reaction
Bitcoin (BTC) recently surged past $97,000 after briefly dipping below $95,000 on February 9. The dip was triggered by reports that China planned to impose tariffs on US energy imports, including crude oil and liquefied natural gas. However, Bitcoin quickly rebounded after US President Donald Trump retaliated with a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports.
Despite this price recovery, investor enthusiasm—especially from institutional traders—remains subdued. Key market indicators suggest that while Bitcoin is holding strong, major investors are not rushing in to buy.
Institutional Investors Remain Cautious
Several metrics indicate that institutional demand for Bitcoin is lagging:
1. Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Weak
US-based spot Bitcoin ETFs saw modest inflows of just $204 million between February 3 and February 7, significantly lower than expected. Meanwhile, Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) made a substantial Bitcoin purchase of $742.3 million in the same period. This suggests that large corporate buyers remain the primary drivers of demand, while traditional institutions are holding back.
2. Derivatives Markets Show Low Confidence
Bitcoin 30-Day Options Skew
One key market sentiment indicator, the 25% delta skew for Bitcoin options, currently sits at 2%. In a bullish environment, this metric would typically be below -5%, indicating stronger demand for call (buy) options. This weaker sentiment suggests traders are hesitant about Bitcoin’s short-term potential.
Futures Market Premium Decline
The annualized premium for Bitcoin futures has dropped to 8%, compared to 11% on February 1. A healthy bull market usually maintains a premium above 10%, meaning current futures market sentiment does not signal strong confidence in further price gains.
Macroeconomic Uncertainty Weighs on Bitcoin
Bitcoin’s price movements are not just about crypto-specific factors—wider economic trends play a significant role. Several macroeconomic developments are creating uncertainty in global markets, which in turn affects Bitcoin trading behavior.
1. Treasury Yields Reflect Risk Aversion
The yield on the US 10-year Treasury bond has fallen to 4.50% from 4.78% a month ago. When yields drop, it often signals that investors are moving toward safer assets, reducing risk appetite for volatile assets like Bitcoin.
2. Trump’s Trade War and Market Volatility
President Trump’s return to office has been marked by aggressive trade policies. The newly announced 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum have sparked concerns over potential economic slowdowns. Bitcoin, like other risk assets, faces uncertainty as investors evaluate the long-term impact of escalating trade tensions.
3. World Bank Credit Rating Warning
On February 10, Moody’s issued a warning that the World Bank’s AAA credit rating could be at risk. If major lenders scale back support, global economic conditions could become more volatile, leading to risk-averse behavior in the financial markets.
What’s Next for Bitcoin?
Despite institutional hesitation and macroeconomic headwinds, Bitcoin’s long-term outlook remains promising. Several US states are exploring legislation to establish Bitcoin reserves, hinting at potential government-driven accumulation in the future.
Can Bitcoin Break $100K?
While Bitcoin struggled to breach $98,000 on February 10, this does not mean a new all-time high is off the table. If market confidence improves and macroeconomic pressures ease, a push toward $100,000 remains a strong possibility.
Investor Takeaway
For now, Bitcoin’s price action suggests a mix of resilience and caution. Retail investors and traders should watch for signs of increasing institutional interest, regulatory shifts, and macroeconomic trends to gauge the next major move in the crypto market.
Disclaimer: The above press release has been provided by a third party. We do not verify or endorse the content and will not be responsible for any inaccuracies, claims, or damages arising from the same.

